TY - BOOK AU - Lagmay,Kristelle Anne P...et.al. TI - Conflict management styles practiced by the couples for Christ-youth for Christ in Ilocos Norte / PY - 2019/// N1 - Thesis (BS in Development Communication) -- Mariano Marcos State University-College of Agriculture, Food and Sustainable Development, Batac City N2 - ABSTRACT LAGMAY, KRISTELLE ANN PAULINE T., TULAY, HANNAH JANE R., and GABAT, MARY JOY Q. 2019. Conflict Management Styles Practiced by the Couples For Christ - Youth For Christ in Ilocos Norte. Department of Development Communication College of Agriculture, Food and Sustainable Development. Mariano Marcos State University. City of Batac, Ilocos Norte. Undergraduate Thesis, 128 pp. Adviser: Emile Kathleen M. Aguilar This descriptive survey research study sought to identify the conflicts faced by the CFC-YFC members related to their program operations in terms of types, persons involved, causes, and effects. It also determined the styles that could help them manage these conflicts including the strengths and weaknesses of each. Eighteen members of the CFC-YFC in the Batac (9) and Laoag (9) chapters in Ilocos Norte who were involved in organizational conflicts in 2016-2018 provided the needed data for the study. In-depth interviews were done on April 1-5, 2019 in the respective homes, schools, and work places of the respondents in their most convenient time. Interviews were recorded and afterwards, transcribed. They were then tabulated using frequency counts and percentages. All the processed data were interpreted narratively with illustrative quotes to reinforce these. The CFC-YFC members mostly experienced relationship conflicts. Of these, attitude differences were mostly encountered. The conflict mostly involved leader-leader and caused frequently by arrogance which resulted typically to anxiety among those involved. The CFC-YFC members also experienced task conflicts. Of these, disagreements over goals for the task were mostly experienced and involved leader-leader. This was typically caused by the members' incompatibilities in their perception of their goals which caused lack of teamwork among them. The least experienced were process conflicts. Of these, disagreements on the strategies, policies, and procedures on how to carry out the task were mostly encountered. The conflict mostly involved leader-leader which was caused by the lack of clarity on how to accomplish their task, which resulted in alienation. The mediation style was mostly used by the CFC-YFC members in handling their relationship conflicts while negotiation was frequently applied for task and process conflicts. The three conflict management styles were found to predominantly have strengths than limitations. Generally, negotiation was used by the members because they can settle their differences on their own without the presence of a third party. They can also engage in it voluntarily and informally but still in a private manner. However, it can hinder compromise when one party refuses to cooperate by not speaking about their true feelings about the issue or are unwilling to share information. Moreover, the side of the more powerful leader usually prevails. On the whole, mediation was also used by the members because they have more courage to open up about their feelings in the presence of a third party facilitator who guides them in the discussion and helps them arrive at an agreement. However, the facilitator can be impartial at times and has a tendency to side one party. Although least employed, arbitration was used because it is quicker to manage or solve problems with the presence of their couple coordinator who listens to both sides of the conflicting parties and hands down a final decision in which the parties are obliged or compelled to follow. No limitations were found in this style. These results imply the wide range of conflicts that could occur in an organization composed of people with different backgrounds, attitudes, workstyles, interests, goals, views, and scarce resources. The variety of management styles (l.e., negotiation, mediation, arbitration) used by the CFC-YFC members in handling conflicts implies that they have a variety of options and that they are free to choose which method is appropriate in every conflict situation in their organization. The common use of negotiation implies that it is quicker to reach agreements or compromises in an informal, voluntary, but private manner by two conflicting parties for as long as they are honest with their feelings and willing to share information. The usual use of mediation, likewise, implies that it is also quicker to settle differences among conflicting members because of the presence of a third party who enlightens them about their issues and guides them in working towards an agreement with the condition that they are willing to share information and their true feelings. Conflicts can damage relationships and affect productivity levels; therefore, it is important for the organization to always be mindful of the signs of conflict and not to be hesitant to intervene. In as much as the organization members can freely choose among themselves the management style appropriate for every conflict situation they face, they should sustain negotiation and mediation. The predominantly favorable outcome of each should encourage the members to go through the respective processes of these styles. ER -